January 23, 2026
Injunction available to fill remedial gap in labour case: BC Court of Appeal
TELUS Communications Inc. v Telecommunications Workers Union, 2026 BCCA 5, was an appeal of a chambers judge’s decision, which “challenges an order granting an interim injunction against a federally regulated employer in the labour relations context. The injunction has since expired but legal questions arising from that proceeding will benefit Read more
The Limits of What Is “Reasonably Necessary”: BC Supreme Court Refuses Broad Injunctive Relief in Post‑Employment Competition Dispute
In AFX Mixing & Pumping Technologies Inc. v. McKinon, 2025 BCSC 2573, the British Columbia Supreme Court dismissed an application for a second interlocutory injunction that would have barred a former managing director from doing business with his former employer’s clients until trial. The plaintiff company, AFX Mixing & Pumping Technologies Inc. (“AFX”), sells and distributes Read more
January 20, 2026
BC Supreme Court grants statutory injunction in construction dispute
In Surrey (City) v Randhawa, 2026 BCSC 16, “the City of Surrey [sought] various declarations and injunctive relief to restrain the respondents from conducting further construction and to require the demolition of what it says is the unauthorized construction on the Property”. The case illustrates how the court deals with Read more
January 16, 2026
New Brunswick court grapples with test for permanent injunction
Royal Bank of Canada v Dickinson, 2025 NBKB 159, was a case involving a mortgage dispute. The respondent was in default, which “led to a mortgage sale, at which the Applicant was the purchaser, and a subsequent notice to vacate sent to the Respondent by the Applicant. The Respondent has Read more
January 13, 2026
Ontario court orders mandatory injunction in franchise dispute
In Keller Williams Realty v VIP Realty Inc., 2025 ONSC 7152, the plaintiffs sought “an order enjoining the Defendants from operating competing real estate brokerages, breaching various terms of their franchise agreements”. “In essence”, the court explained, “the Plaintiffs raise two sets of claims against the Defendants. KWR’s claims concern Read more
















































