The issue of discount rates was first referred to the Commission in a letter from the Deputy Attorney General in February of this year. That letter enclosed a copy of a draft Prospective Pecuniary Damages Act dealing, inter alia, with discount rates and Mr. Vogel requested the Commission to “assess this proposal and make constructive comments” and it was in that spirit the Commission approached it.
In April, the Commission wrote to the Attorney General suggesting an amendment to the Supreme Court Act along the following lines:
The Chief Justice, after consulting the other judges of the court and such other persons as he considers appropriate, may prescribe from time to time the rate of interest to be used in determining the capitalized value of an award in respect of future damages.
This suggestion prompted further discussion which largely centred on two principal issues
- Should the discount rate be set by a person or body other than the Chief Justice (SC BC)
- Should the discount rate prescribed be limited to one that reflects only the difference between the estimated rates of price inflation and investment or should the so-called “productivity factor” be an additional parameter?
The current project will focus on reviewing and making recommendations on two principal issues of discount rate.
Keywords: discount rate; future; damage; future interest; inflation;
productivity; present value; pecuniary; dependency; compensation; injury; capitalization; award
Below you will find additional, relevant and specific documentation, backgrounders, research, resources, media releases and summaries that have been, or will be incorporated into our final publications and study papers.
If you have questions about these or other specific documents, please reach out to BCLI using our contact page or at the bottom of each page of our website.