The Rule in Bain v. Fothergill (1976)
The rule in Bain v. Fothergill-which was given its definitive statement in a nineteenth-century English case of that name-holds that damages for breach of contract are not ordinarily available to a purchaser under a contract for the sale of land if the breach is due to a defect in title to the land. This project examines whether the rule in Bain v. Fothergill should continue to hold sway in contemporary British Columbia, which has a land title system that is markedly different than that of nineteenth-century England.
Below you will find additional, relevant and specific documentation, backgrounders, research, resources, media releases and summaries that have been, or will be incorporated into our final publications and study papers.
If you have questions about these or other specific documents, please reach out to BCLI using our contact page or at the bottom of each page of our website.