The Rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn (1977)

Project Status: LRC Reports
Project Contact: British Columbia Law Institute
Telephone Number: 604.822.0142
Email Us About this Project


Keywords: Hollington v. Hewthorn; previous; conviction; acquittal; burden of proof; proof; evidence; admissibility; defamation; civil; proceeding; jury; action; judgment; offence; hearsay; abolition; plea; matrimonial; cause; adultery; filiation

In civil proceedings, evidence that a party to the lawsuit has previously been convicted of an offence arising out of the same facts as are at issue in the civil proceedings is not admissible. This rule of evidence is known as the rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn, after the mid-twentieth-century English case in which it was stated. This project surveys court cases applying the rule, in British Columbia and elsewhere, and considers the options for legislative reform.

This website and its publications are not legal advice. Need legal assistance? Visit our Resources page.


30. Report on The Rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn

Download document (385 KB)


Report on the Rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn

Download document (55 KB)

Website by: Usable Web Designs