The Rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn (1977)
Keywords: Hollington v. Hewthorn; previous; conviction; acquittal; burden of proof; proof; evidence; admissibility; defamation; civil; proceeding; jury; action; judgment; offence; hearsay; abolition; plea; matrimonial; cause; adultery; filiation
In civil proceedings, evidence that a party to the lawsuit has previously been convicted of an offence arising out of the same facts as are at issue in the civil proceedings is not admissible. This rule of evidence is known as the rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn, after the mid-twentieth-century English case in which it was stated. This project surveys court cases applying the rule, in British Columbia and elsewhere, and considers the options for legislative reform.
Below you will find additional, relevant and specific documentation, backgrounders, research, resources, media releases and summaries that have been, or will be incorporated into our final publications and study papers.
If you have questions about these or other specific documents, please reach out to BCLI using our contact page or at the bottom of each page of our website.