September 26, 2025
Reliance on hearsay, breadth of order lead BC Court of Appeal to deny ministry’s request for a permanent injunction
British Columbia (Ministry of Social Development and Poverty Reduction) v Choquette, 2025 BCCA 333, involved an appeal by the ministry from a chambers judge’s decision to reject a claim for a permanent injunction. The appeal largely turned on the application of section 42 of the Evidence Act—which sets out the Read more…
September 5, 2025
Irreparable harm in the spotlight as injunction denied in commercial-lease dispute
In Naghmeh v 1530378 B.C. Ltd., 2025 BCSC 1673, the BC Supreme Court declined to grant commercial tenants the injunction they sought against their landlord in a dispute over parking at a “a multi-unit commercial centre”. The case allowed the court to consider the legal framework for granting injunctions set Read more…
August 27, 2025
BC ministry declares its policy intentions on parentage
In a significant step toward new legislation, the Ministry of Attorney General for BC has just published a policy intentions paper (PDF) for Phase 2 of the Family Law Act Modernization Project. The ministry’s paper “addresses several important topics that support parents and guardians in resolving family law matters outside Read more…
August 7, 2025
The persistence of the Shimco Lien: Revisiting the dual lien theory in light of Kingdom Langley Project Ltd. Partnership v WQC Mechanical Ltd.
Introduction A recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, Kingdom Langley Project Ltd. Partnership v WQC Mechanical Ltd. (Kingdom Langley) has reaffirmed the controversial interpretation of the holdback provisions of the Builders Lien Act (Act). The controversy emanates from the Court’s earlier ruling in Shimco Metal Erectors Ltd. Read more…
July 30, 2025
The Rule of Law within a Legally Plural Society
In R v Cavanaugh, 2025 BCCA 252 (Cavanaugh), the BC Court of Appeal (BCCA) touches on a number of important legal issues. An earlier post on this blog summarized parts of the case that deal with using the court’s contempt power to punish the breach an injunction in a resource Read more…
















































