January 2, 2026
BC Supreme Court restrains City of Kelowna from terminating lease in the midst of real-estate-development dispute
350 Doyle Avenue Holdings Inc. v City of Kelowna, 2025 BCSC 2532, concerned an application “for an interlocutory or, alternatively, interim injunction preventing the defendant, the City of Kelowna . . ., from terminating a 99-year lease for property located in downtown Kelowna”. The case involved three conjoined actions over a large-scale Read more…
December 30, 2025
BC Supreme Court grants injunction restraining Indigenous financial-services business from competing with former employer
In a case decided near the end of December 2025, the BC Supreme Court considered the application of the three-stage test for a pre-trial injunction to a case involving the enforcement of restrictive covenants in a contractual dispute. People Corporation v White Raven Consulting Ltd., 2025 BCSC 2525, concerned an Read more…
September 5, 2025
Irreparable harm in the spotlight as injunction denied in commercial-lease dispute
In Naghmeh v 1530378 B.C. Ltd., 2025 BCSC 1673, the BC Supreme Court declined to grant commercial tenants the injunction they sought against their landlord in a dispute over parking at a “a multi-unit commercial centre”. The case allowed the court to consider the legal framework for granting injunctions set Read more…
July 21, 2025
BC Court of Appeal declines to allow colour-of-right defence based on Indigenous laws
R v Cavanaugh, 2025 BCCA 252, was an appeal from several convictions for criminal contempt. The convictions involved interfering with a Trans Mountain pipeline site in breach of an injunction. “The primary issue on appeal”, the court noted, was “whether the judge failed to take Indigenous laws into account when Read more…
July 4, 2025
BC Supreme Court denies anticipatory injunction in racetrack dispute
Harness Racing B.C. Society v Orangeville Raceway Limited, 2025 BCSC 1249—a recent decision of the BC Supreme Court—was a dispute between the owners of a horse-racing facility (the defendants) and a society and its members (the plaintiffs), who were among the main users of the racetrack facility. The dispute turned Read more…
















































