January 6, 2026

Charter remedy not available in contempt of court case: Alberta Court of Appeal

The underlying dispute in Lymer v Jonsson, 2025 ABCA 423, concerned an investment scheme in breach of the Alberta Securities Act, RSA 2000, c S-4. The appellant in this Alberta Court of Appeal decision from late December 2025 was involved in the promotion of this scheme. The appellant was also, Read more…

January 2, 2026

BC Supreme Court restrains City of Kelowna from terminating lease in the midst of real-estate-development dispute

350 Doyle Avenue Holdings Inc. v City of Kelowna, 2025 BCSC 2532, concerned an application “for an interlocutory or, alternatively, interim injunction preventing the defendant, the City of Kelowna . . ., from terminating a 99-year lease for property located in downtown Kelowna”. The case involved three conjoined actions over a large-scale Read more…

December 30, 2025

BC Supreme Court grants injunction restraining Indigenous financial-services business from competing with former employer

In a case decided near the end of December 2025, the BC Supreme Court considered the application of the three-stage test for a pre-trial injunction to a case involving the enforcement of restrictive covenants in a contractual dispute. People Corporation v White Raven Consulting Ltd., 2025 BCSC 2525, concerned an Read more…

October 1, 2025

NS Supreme Court denies injunction despite finding applicant had a strong prima facie case

In Court v Court, 2025 NSSC 303, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia found that an applicant wasn’t entitled to a pre-trial injunction despite having a strong prima facie (= “at first sight”; based on a first impression) case. The Nova Scotia decision is an interesting example of how a Read more…

September 26, 2025

Reliance on hearsay, breadth of order lead BC Court of Appeal to deny ministry’s request for a permanent injunction

British Columbia (Ministry of Social Development and Poverty Reduction) v Choquette, 2025 BCCA 333, involved an appeal by the ministry from a chambers judge’s decision to reject a claim for a permanent injunction. The appeal largely turned on the application of section 42 of the Evidence Act—which sets out the Read more…