October 19, 2018
BC Supreme Court directs an assessment of strata corporation’s reasonable legal costs for remedying a contravention of its age bylaw
In The Owners, Strata Plan NWS3075 v Stevens, 2018 BCSC 1784, the BC Supreme Court considered a strata corporation’s request for an order that the respondent strata-lot owner “pay its actual legal fees, other fees and disbursements pursuant to s. 133 of the Strata Property Act.” Section 133 allows a strata corporation Read more
October 18, 2018
Court finds that strata corporation’s decision to share expenses based on unit entitlement was significantly unfair to owner
In King Day Holdings Ltd v The Owners, Strata Plan LMS3851, 2018 BCSC 1772, the BC Supreme Court considered a petitioner’s request for “a declaration that the strata fees [and special levies] levied against it by the respondent strata corporation constitute a significantly unfair action and seeks relief under s. 164.” Read more
October 16, 2018
FOLRAC considers diversity in decision-making at 2018 symposium
On 11–12 October 2018 the Federation of Law Reform Agencies of Canada held its biennial symposium in Edmonton, on the campus of the University of Alberta. Each of FOLRAC’s member-agencies—the Alberta Law Reform Institute, the British Columbia Law Institute, the Law Commission of Ontario, the Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan, Read more
October 11, 2018
BC Law Institute Announces Changes on the Board of Directors
On September 12th, the BC Law Institute held its Annual General Meeting and is pleased to announce the executive committee for 2018-2019: Thomas L. Spraggs, Chair Andrea Rolls, Vice Chair Margaret H. Mason Q.C., Treasurer Oliver Fleck, Secretary Lisa A. Peters Q.C., Past Chair BCLI is pleased to welcome to Read more
October 5, 2018
Court orders that temporarily deprive owners of voting rights can be reconciled with democratic governance of a strata corporation: BC Supreme Court
Norenger Development (Canada) Inc v Strata Plan NW 3271, 2018 BCSC 1690, is the latest proceeding in a long-running dispute between the sections of “a two-building condominium development known as the Richmond Landmark,” which has already featured notable decisions from the BC Supreme Court and BC Court of Appeal. These two Read more

















































