October 19, 2018

BC Supreme Court directs an assessment of strata corporation’s reasonable legal costs for remedying a contravention of its age bylaw

In The Owners, Strata Plan NWS3075 v Stevens, 2018 BCSC 1784, the BC Supreme Court considered a strata corporation’s request for an order that the respondent strata-lot owner “pay its actual legal fees, other fees and disbursements pursuant to s. 133 of the Strata Property Act.” Section 133 allows a strata corporation Read more

October 18, 2018

Court finds that strata corporation’s decision to share expenses based on unit entitlement was significantly unfair to owner

In King Day Holdings Ltd v The Owners, Strata Plan LMS3851, 2018 BCSC 1772, the BC Supreme Court considered a petitioner’s request for “a declaration that the strata fees [and special levies] levied against it by the respondent strata corporation constitute a significantly unfair action and seeks relief under s. 164.” Read more

October 16, 2018

FOLRAC considers diversity in decision-making at 2018 symposium

On 11–12 October 2018 the Federation of Law Reform Agencies of Canada held its biennial symposium in Edmonton, on the campus of the University of Alberta. Each of FOLRAC’s member-agencies—the Alberta Law Reform Institute, the British Columbia Law Institute, the Law Commission of Ontario, the Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan, Read more

October 11, 2018

BC Law Institute Announces Changes on the Board of Directors

On September 12th, the BC Law Institute held its Annual General Meeting and is pleased to announce the executive committee for 2018-2019: Thomas L. Spraggs, Chair Andrea Rolls, Vice Chair Margaret H. Mason Q.C., Treasurer Oliver Fleck, Secretary Lisa A. Peters Q.C., Past Chair BCLI is pleased to welcome to Read more

October 5, 2018

Court orders that temporarily deprive owners of voting rights can be reconciled with democratic governance of a strata corporation: BC Supreme Court

Norenger Development (Canada) Inc v Strata Plan NW 3271, 2018 BCSC 1690, is the latest proceeding in a long-running dispute between the sections of “a two-building condominium development known as the Richmond Landmark,” which has already featured notable decisions from the BC Supreme Court and BC Court of Appeal. These two Read more